The past few weeks have been interesting, to say the least. But in the midst of the many varied ways in which this election season is bringing to light many profound rifts and changes in American society, Crusty has also been watching how religion and the church (small c) has had its own dark places laid bare. Just a few examples:
--We have the fact that the U.S. Catholic bishops, by and large, seem to have abrogated any kind of teaching function the episcopate supposedly has. By reducing the role of the church solely to
|Hey Catholic bishops, remember this guy? He spoke truth to power in June 2004.|
--There is the revelation of divisions within evangelical Protestantism. This is the story here, friends, and COD has been annoyed by the predominant narrative that "Evangelical Protestants paradoxically support Trump." While it is certainly the case that the majority of persons self-identifying as evangelicals will be voting for Trump, and that many religious leaders have served as little more than spiritual money launderers for Trump, willing to explain away and excuse anything if it gets their hands closer to the levers of power, evangelical support, particularly from evangelical leaders, has been far from monolithic. There have been consistent voices in opposition. The Southern Baptist Convention, the largest conservative evangelical church in the United States, has approved supporting refugee resettlement. Some of its top leaders, sich as Richard Land and Albert Mohler, have openly, consistently, and regularly disavowed Trump's policies. Others include Max Lucado, Tony Campolo, Beth Moore, and Jim Wallis, among others. Saying "Why do evangelicals continue to support Trump?" is like saying "Why don't Muslims condemn violence?" Moderate Muslims have been condemning violence for over 15 years, it's just that most media doesn't report or pay attention. Prominent evangelicals have been disavowing Trump, it's just that most media doesn't report, pay attention, or have any modicum of understanding of the dynamics involved.
Crusty was also pondering some of the responses by religious leaders to the audio recording of Trump bragging about sexually assaulting women. Reading a few articles, Crusty also saw that producer Mark Burnett has hundreds of hours of videotape from Trump's TV show, footage never meant to be aired of background conversations. As he did, COD suddenly found himself thinking:
What if we had hundreds of hours of videotape of church meetings and church leaders? What if we had hot microphones that recorded some of our own conversations? What would it lay bare about our own sins and self-serving lies?
There is the reality that in some cases, in some places, more often than we might like to admit, we would learn that the Episcopal Church has an ordination process that borders on spiritual and emotional abuse, if not, at times, downright misconduct. The following are all actual stories from the ordination process.
--I asked someone once how their interview with the Commission on Ministry went, and the person replied, "Well, I'm not sure how well I responded to one question." I asked what the question was. The person said that they were interviewed not by the Commission as a whole, but had two interviews with smaller groups of 3-4 Commission members. In one of the small groups, a male clergyperson asked her, "How will you deal with the fact that you are so attractive you will be a distracting presence leading worship?" She then told me what her answer had been, and said she couldn't tell by the members' responses whether it was the right one or not.
I said, "I just want to say that I'm sorry that you were sexually harassed as part of the ordination process. And I'm even sorrier that the apology had to come from me, and not from anyone actually involved in the process." She looked startled that I had named it as such, but then she paused and said, "That's what I thought, too, but since none of the other people said anything about it, I thought that I was overreacting." Since the person who had asked the question was a clergyperson, I informed her what her rights were under the Constitution and Canons should she wish to pursue a complaint. She quickly said, "No, I couldn't do that, the person would torpedo my ordination process."
--Another person shared with me that his Commission on Ministry interview was prefaced by the following words: "We're going to ask you some questions, and don't say you can't answer some of them, because the church is exempt from what may be considered discrimination under the law. And if you don't answer them, you will be considered as not complying with this process." Apart from being untrue, or possibly an outright lie by someone who knows better, this is simply normalizing abuse as a way to begin an interview process.
--A young woman in her mid-20s was told, "You will have the most intimate details of people's lives in your hands. You need to get more life experience and come back in a few years." This despite the
|Welcome to your Commission on Ministry interview.|
--A friend of mine shared in his Commission on Ministry interview that he had entered Alcoholics Anonymous several months previously. A member said, "If you're just saying that so we'll be sympathetic to you and not ask any difficult questions, that's not the case, we're going to treat you like we do everyone else."
There's been a lot of talk of "gaslighting" in this election season. Named from the classic movie where Charles Boyer convinces Ingrid Bergman she's losing her mind by imagining flickering gaslights that he himself is causing, "gaslighting," loosely defined, is a process by which one person manipulates another through abuse, lies, and deception to get that other person to doubt their own perception of reality and impose a power dynamic of the abuser's choosing. Many have noted how politics, presenting starkly
|Coming soon: Gaslighteucharist?|
Friends, our ordination process is just one way in which the church has its own gaslighting, justifying sometimes offensive, insensitive, and abusive behavior as perfectly normal. Yet because the people being gaslighted have no agency and are powerless in the ordination process, we'll never know how many more stories like this are out there.
Trump's bragging about sexual assault has been rightly condemned by some church leaders. In doing so, however, Crusty wonders what the church's Billy Bush moments could have been, had we been caught on tape with our own sins of sexual abuse laid bare.
--Perhaps if we had a Nixon-like taping system at 815 we would have known about former Presiding Bishop Ed Browning covering up sexual abuse of minors by the former bishop of Northwest Pennsylvania. This has been public knowledge since 2010 and there has never been any kind of acknowledgment of the failure of the Presiding Bishop to be held accountable for his actions. And please, no sanctimonious protestations that we shouldn't bring this up because of Bishop Browning's recent passing. He was a public figure, and, like public figures, he is the sum of his actions and his legacy is part of the public record. We do not treat other public figures, even religious figures, this way. Several news outlets noted some of the controversies surrounding Nobel Peace Prize winner Elise Wiesel in their obituaries. Crusty bets many people who would protest we shouldn't bring up PB Browning's actions will pile on when war criminal Henry Kissinger is finally called to account for his genocide when he meets his maker. Bishop Browning was a great leader and gift to the church, but never was held to any kind of accounting for, let us repeat, covering up sexual abuse of minors. There was no reporting to police, there were no ecclesial charges. The already-retired bishop was asked to resign from the House of Bishops, refrain from performing any clerical duties, and seek counseling, all of this in private. This is does not undo all the good that PB Browning did for the church, but it is a stain on his legacy, and it is to the church's continued shame if it consistently refuses to address this in the rush to hagiography.
--Perhaps the coverups at Episcopal schools like St. Stephen's in Texas, St. George's in Rhode Island, would have been more difficult if we had audiotape of the conversations of those in power.
--Perhaps we could call to account all those still held unaccountable of sexual harassment and sexual misconduct. Crusty has heard stories than he cannot share about sexual harassment, inappropriate behavior, and sexual abuse, especially by female colleagues, because they have been told in confidence. We have to denounce the continued coverup of sexual harassment and sexual misconduct in our own church, and set in place some real efforts to hold not only the perpetrators accountable, but those who ignore, excuse, rationalize and flat-out cover up this misconduct before we congratulate ourselves for rightly condemning it in our political sphere. Would that there was a Spotlight movie for the Episcopal Church.
Trump's numerous attempts to blame others for his behavior, including that he was "egged on" by Billy Bush, has led to the twitter hastag "#BillyBushMadeMeDoIt."
What if, in addition to mockery, we asked ourselves: what if Billy Bush was there to expose the church's sins?